2013 Budget Increases Out of East Windsor's Control
The Township has no control over certain budget increases that are mandated by the state.
The East Windsor Mayor and Council conducted a special meeting on Tuesday overviewing the 2013 budget with several municipal departments, including the Township Court and Police Department.
The meeting gave the municipal departments an opportunity to make budget requests and for the Council to ask questions about the itemized budgets submitted by each department. The Council is meeting with all of the Township departments and agencies and reviewing all of the proposed expenditures for the 2013 budget, Mayor Janice Mironov said.
The East Windsor Court did not receive DWI funds from the state because less than 113 DWI’s occurred in the prior year; according to state law, 113 DWI arrests must be made in a municipality in order for the town to receive DWI funds.
Nevertheless, Mironov said that all department costs are coming in relatively level and stable, but there are portions of the budget which the Council has less control over, such as health benefits.
Since 2010, East Windsor has received their group health insurance through the State Health Benefits Program. This year, the State Health Benefits Program is requiring larger contributions of at least $200,000 as the state has certified a 9.2 percent increase on the entire program, Mironov said. Therefore, East Windsor will see a net increase in group health insurance costs from 2012 to 2013 of approximately $200,000 from $2,103,988 in the 2012 budget to
$2,302,500 in the 2013 budget, Mironov explained.
Other areas of the budget that have increased for 2013 are also out of the Township’s control. These include the state billed increase in pensions of $117,000 and the state mandated formula for the Reserve for Uncollected Taxes, which is expected to increase an estimated $250,000, according to the mayor.
The 2013 budget is still under review and nothing has been finalized, according to Mironov. When the final numbers are in the Council will determine what is inside the cap and what is outside of the cap, Mironov said.
Currently, the revenues and the tax valuation of the Township is being finalized. When the full budget proposal is complete it will be presented to the public around mid-March, at which time all issues will be addressed.
Tugwalla
1:17 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Funny how the mayor always blames the state "boogey man"! She uses those expenses that are "out of the Township’s control" to hide the bloated and padded payroll and administrative waste!
Caroline Hawkins
4:40 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013
Leave the mayor alone. She has been very good over the years! Don't turn your back on her now! She can't help it!
You have done a very good job. Keep up the good work!
Jake
9:45 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Very good? Compared to what? Last time I looked we have a Township manager form of government, not a mayor led dictatorship. Her reputation keeps businesses out of town and her people skills are horrible. Take a closer look before you hand out praise.
Tugwalla
5:14 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013
Yes she cannot help but raise taxes and ignore waste and over spending...sure leave her alone. You cannot be serious can you?
big dog
11:48 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
What waste and overspending are you referring to? Just curious
Tugwalla
12:27 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Dog...be an engaged citizen and read the budget! That's the problem voters believe all lies and nonsense spewed from politicians without doing their homework. Try being an educated voter rather than a curious dolt!
Jake
9:42 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Well, for starters she can work with the unions to change health benefits. EW employees get a very rich benefits program at no cost to anyone except the taxpayers. Secondly she can offer buyouts at reduced rates for employees who have dual family coverage. And i'm sure there are more opportunities to cut spending. Taxes in this Township are outrageous. Why? Because people are lazy and expect a high degree of government services that cost $$$.
big dog
7:36 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013
Tug - how about answering the question. What waste and overspending are YOU referring to. I'll admit it, I didn't read the budget, but since you did, please share your thoughts on what can be cut.
Jake - didn't the mayor move the health benefits to the state run program, which was supposed to reduce costs? Did that happen or am I just being a curious dolt. Other than negotiating with the union, what government service do yuo want to cut?
Jake
1:08 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Yes, she did move it to the SHBP at a cost of nearly $30,000 per employee annually. Do you call that saving money? Big Dog if you expect other taxpayers to do all the homework then it appears as though you, like so many other EW residents are voting for people, programs and budgets that you really don't understand. +
big dog
6:50 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
I don't believe your numbers. Please provide a link showing that moving to teh SHBP costs $30,000 per employee. Surely, you must have some proof of this.