patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

[POLL] Should a School Require a Breathalyzer Before Prom?

Princeton High School denied entry to students who declined to take a breathalyzer, sparking some approval, some objections. What do you think?

 

 

Students who attended Princeton High School's prom on May 24 had to agree to take a breath test prior to entry. Two students refused the voluntary test and were denied admission to prom, according to NJ.com.

This isn't the first time the school district has taken a hard line.

Last fall, administrators canceled the high school's homecoming dance, citing past incidents of inappropriate dancing and underage drinking. The school instead hosted a movie followed by an outdoor bonfire. 

The U.S. Supreme Court has made two rulings related to this issue. In 1995's Vernonia School District v. Acton, the court said random drug testing of student athletes was legal. In 2002's Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls

Pottawatomie County v. Earls, the court expanded the first decision to include students in competitive extracurricular activities. 

What do you think about Princeton's decision regarding prom?

  • Do You Agree with Princeton High School's Decision to Require a Breath Test Before Admitting Students into Prom?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • YES, Absolutely! Underage drinking is illegal and the school needs to act in the best interest of its students.
        37 (45%)
    • Yes, I agree with the district's decision, but wish this had been handled a bit more sensitively.
        16 (19%)
    • No, I disagree with the breath test. Students have rights too.
        14 (17%)
    • Absolutely Not. What happened to our civil liberties in this country?
        14 (17%)
    • Other (leave a comment below)
        1 (1%)
    Total votes: 82
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Princeton Public Schools, alcohol testing, and princeton high school

Matthew Brian Hersh

10:29 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

It's unfortunate and a decidedly authoritarian and unromantic way to start a memorable evening. That said, I understand the concern and, let's face it, people get patted down when walking into most venues these days, can get a car inspected without warning at a police checkpoint, etc. I wish school authorities tested those students who were suspected to be drinking, rather than suspect everyone to be drinking.

Reply

Robin Williams

11:19 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

As a high school teacher and as someone who believes in democracy I do not believe this is appropriate.

Reply

Just Saying

7:22 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

School is a place where you go to learn. The schools job is to educate. It is the police departments job to uphold the laws. Let's all stop trying to do each others jobs and focus on our own primary responsibilities.

Reply

Bob Schwartz

12:16 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012

This article calls it a "voluntary" test but it clearly wasn't. Test the students based on reasonable suspicion instead of "guilty until proven innocent." This is America!

Reply

Leave a comment