State Revenues Running Almost $100 Million Short of Christie Projections
Democrats: governor will have to worry about budget cuts, not tax cuts.
One day after Standard & Poor’s lowered New Jersey’s fiscal outlook from stable to negative, the Christie administration confirmed the bad news. The latest revenue figures show that state tax revenues are running $99.873 million -- or 4.9 percent -- below the governor’s projections for the first two months of the fiscal year.
While Governor Chris Christie is banking on a 7.2 percent increase in state revenues to fund a midyear tax cut heading into his reelection campaign, tax collections in July and August were actually $5.5 million – or 0.3 percent -- lower than for the same two months in 2011.
“Unfortunately this is not a surprise considering all the poor economic indicators and warnings by numerous financial experts that the governor’s numbers aren’t going to add up,” said Assembly Budget Committee Chairman Vincent Prieto (D-Hudson), whose committee held a hearing on the status of state revenue collections yesterday morning.
David Rosen, the budget officer for the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services, told Prieto’s committee that the estimated $254 million shortfall in the budget for the fiscal year that ended June 30 means that state revenues will now have to grow 8.2 percent to hit the $31.7 billion in budget revenues that Christie certified in June. Rosen made that projection four hours before the state Treasury Department announced the $100 million July-August revenue shortfall.
The August revenue numbers capped a week of bad headlines for Christie, as Moody’s Investor Service, Fitch’s Ratings, and Standard & Poor’s all questioned his revenue projections and issued warnings about the precarious state of New Jersey’s short-term and long-term finances.
For Christie, who is up for reelection in 2013, the political stakes involved in hitting his revenue numbers are enormous. Christie’s optimistic revenue estimates were the basis for his demand that the Democratic-controlled Legislature enact an income tax cut in June.
Democratic legislative leaders balked at Christie’s demand, questioning how he could anticipate the highest revenue growth in the nation when the state ranked 47th in economic growth the previous year and unemployment was well above the national average. Instead, Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) said he would consider enacting an income tax cut in December or January -- but only if Christie’s revenue projections prove accurate.
With the recent spate of bad news, Prieto and his Democratic colleagues on the Assembly Budget Committee yesterday questioned whether they should be looking for budget cuts rather than tax cuts.
Assemblyman Declan O’Scanlon (R-Monmouth), the Assembly Republican budget officer, denounced yesterday’s committee hearing as nothing more than political theater. “These are volatile and unpredictable times,” he acknowledged, ”but to call today’s hearing anything more than political opportunism by the Democrats would be disingenuous.”
Treasurer Andrew Sidamon-Eristoff infuriated Prieto by declining his invitation to appear before the committee. He reportedly kept a previous commitment to speak to a convention of New Jersey government finance officers instead and did not release his August revenue report until after the committee hearing had ended.
Sidamon-Eristoff chose to emphasize the positive in his report, noting that corporate tax collections were up and that “this was the highest collection of income tax in state history for the month of August.”
But Sidamon-Eristoff’s charts told a different story: Income tax collections in August, while an all-time high, were still $31.5 million -- or 4.5 percent -- below the Christie administration’s projections for the month.
Continue reading on NJSpotlight.com.
NJ Spotlight is an issue-driven news website that provides critical insight to New Jersey’s communities and businesses. It is non-partisan, independent, policy-centered and community-minded.