What if there was an infection that can cause permanent nerve damage and pain? What if the virus could affect the eye and cause blindness or affect the brain and cause meningitis? What if the burning rash attacks almost half of all Americans sometime in their life? If you knew there was a vaccine which could protect you from that malady, would you get the shot? The disease is called Shingles or Herpes Zoster and despite a successful vaccine being available only five (5) percent of eligible adults have been inoculated. Have you?
When we were children most of us got the Chicken Pox infection, also called “Varicella.” This is caused by the Varicella-Zoster virus and results in a short illness with a rash and fever. Most children recover without difficulty, and often enjoy a brief respite from school. The interesting thing is that we never get rid of the virus. It hides in the bodies of nerve cells next to our spine or face. We live our whole lives never feeling that dormant infection.
Sometimes, as we get older, that same virus can burst out of the nerve in which it has been sleeping. At age 30 healthy persons have a 1 in a 1000 chance each year of the Chicken Pox virus awakening. By age 65, it happens to more than 1 in a 100 each year. If we become ill, in almost any form, there is a further increase in the chance of the painful droplets breaking out on our skin. This is because of weakness in our immune system. If we live to be 85, more than half of us will get Shingles.
As the virus has been hiding in a nerve, the rash will follow the length of that nerve. If the nerve is on a leg, Shingles will be a red band with little bubbles (also known as vesicles or pox), along the leg. On the chest or arm the rash will follow the nerve like a stripe. If it affects the nerve that crosses the front of the eye, it can cause painful, scarring injury to the front of the eye (cornea). Because each nerve covers only half the body, the clue to a shingles rash is that it stops exactly at the middle of the body and affects only one half.
There are several stages of a zoster attack. First, before there is any rash, there is numbness, burning or sharp pain. It can be confusing to have an intense pain without any obvious injury. Early shingles pain over the left chest is often confused with a heart attack. Then a day or two later little clear fluid filled bubbles appear. They gradually form a continuous stripe rapping around half the body. Usually, the rash never leaves this one area. Rarely, in patients with severe immune problems like leukemia, lupus or HIV, the virus can spread over the body like a severe case of Chicken Pox.
As long as there are fluid filled bubbles the patient is contagious. However, they are not contagious for Shingles. You cannot catch Shingles. They are contagious for Chicken Pox. If a patient with Shingles encounters someone who has never had Chicken Pox, then they can give that person Chicken Pox. Eventually the bubbles dry up. However, because the infection has burst out of the nerve there may be extended or even permanent pain in the nerve. In some individuals this can be incapacitating or require long term pain medicine. This is known as Post-Herpetic Neuralgia.
Obviously, Herpes Zoster is a condition which none of us ever wishes to acquire. One way to protect ourselves is to never get Chicken Pox. For children, who can be protected by the Chicken Pox vaccine this is a reasonable approach. However, for most of us adults who had Chicken Pox when we were young, this is an impossible solution. In fact some scientists believe that adults who had the Chicken Pox infection as children can be protected from getting Shingles by occasionally being exposed to a child with an active Chicken Pox infection. Therefore, as more children are vaccinated for Chicken Pox there may be an increase in Shingles. Fortunately, there are alternatives.
The best solution is the Shingles Vaccine. Manufactured and sold as Zostavax, the vaccine is recommended by the CDC for use by healthy people 60 years or older. The ACIP recommends it for anyone 60 or more who has previously had Shingles, had any chronic medical condition or lives in a long term care facility. Zostavax decreases the chance of getting Shingles by 50% and decreases the chance of permanent pain if you do get the rash by 70%. Zostavax is a single shallow subcutaneous injection and is not repeated. This is a live vaccine, so cannot be given to someone who already has a suppressed immune system. The main side effect is irritation at the injection site and a 2% chance of a flu like syndrome. Zostavax cannot be used to treat an active Shingles infection.
If you do get Shingles, contact your doctor immediately. Oral antiviral medicines started within the first 72 hours of the breakout, reduce the chance of nerve damage and pain. These medicines also decrease the severity and length of a zoster attack. Many doctors also put patients with a Shingles attack on steroids because this may also prevent Post Herpetic Neuralgia. This is somewhat controversial, because of the potential side effects of steroids. If there is involvement in or next to the eye, it is vital to see an ophthalmologist immediately.
Shingles, Herpes Zoster, is a self-limited painful rash that can cause permanent injury. It can make anyone’s life a little harder, especially if they are already dealing with other medical problems. If you are over 60, talk to you doctor about being vaccinated.
As published in Sunrise Rounds.
By using this blog, you agree to these terms, which may change. This blog is for personal educational use only. Children under the age of 13 may not use this blog. Blog user agrees not to rely on this blog and releases Blogger from any damages arising from its use. This blog is compliant with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Please report infringements to jimsal@sunriserounds.com.
Phyllis Coffey
9:35 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
As posted on Dr. Mercola's webpage.
A recent review of the varicella (chickenpox) vaccination program in the U.S. concluded that the vaccine has not proven to be cost-effective; increased the incidence of shingles; failed to provide long-term protection from the disease it targets―chicken pox―and; is less effective than the natural immunity that existed in the general population before the vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was found to have declined well below 80 percent by of 2002
Phyllis Coffey
10:13 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Educate yourself before you consider getting this shot. Attached are two links with information you should read. Quoted in one- "The main reason I would not get the shingles vaccine is that it is manufactured by Merck. I do not trust most pharmaceutical companies, anyway, but Merck tops the list, especially after they got in trouble for making up research studies and articles and then paying respected scientists to put their names on them."
Another Quote from Dr. Mercola's site:
Two virologists have filed a federal lawsuit against Merck, their former employer, alleging the vaccine maker overstated the effectiveness of their mumps vaccine, which may have cost the US government hundreds of millions of dollars over the past decade. They claim they “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine's efficacy findings"
http://nursedetective.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=43%3Avaccines&id=94%3Adangers-of-the-shingles-vaccine&Itemid=66
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/07/10/merck-lying-about-vaccine-effectiveness.aspx?e_cid=20120710_DNL_artNew_1
James Salwitz
11:04 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Major authors in this area, including Harvard Medical School, the CDC, ACIP, USPSTF, and the NIH support the use of the Zoster Vaccine as outlined above. The issues noted in Ms Coffey's comment relate to the Chicken Pox and Mumps vaccines.
jcs
Phyllis Coffey
11:14 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
And Merck's record of fraud should just be overlooked and we should trust that this vaccine is safe and effective?
Joyce Teer
2:20 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Thank you Ms. Coffey for bringing to the forefront issues regarding vaccines (pharmaceuticals in general). I'm appalled by the commericalization of products which in the advertising include disclaimers that essentially state not everyone who receives product will be helped. It's a crapshoot. Why the push for something not tried and true? $$$,$$$,$$$! Buyer beware!
Phyllis Coffey
2:38 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
You're welcome Joyce. It's disgraceful how the pharmaceutical companies seem to be controlling all aspects of our medical system. Merck just lost a law suit in Italy, the court found that the MMR vaccine caused Autism. I don't understand why it isn't being report on our local news....maybe it's because the pharmaceutical companies are now one of their biggest advertisers, money rules.
Hightstown Homeowner
12:30 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
It isn't being reported because it isn't news. Vaccines do NOT cause autism. That theory has been debunked several times over. Andrew Wakefield was a fraud and The Lancet retracted his paper. And why shouldn't pharma companies be allowed to advertise?
Phyllis Coffey
7:19 pm on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Homeowner,
You need to educate yourself on vaccines. And what about the Fruad committed...no comment on that. Maybe you work for Merck? You didn't leave your name, is there a reason for that?
Hightstown Homeowner
8:19 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012
I am well educated on vaccines and know, as do other intelligent people that vaccines do not cause autism. But you have found your big, bad boogeyman and you aren't going to let go no matter how much evidence to the contrary you are presented with. Does it matter if I leave my name or not? What does that change?
Phyllis Coffey
9:44 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012
Check out this website...it seems that I am not alone!
http://www.newswithviews.com/Tocco/mary103.htm
And this will end my discussion on this. Have fun! Do some reading!
Sara
10:10 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012
Wow, instead of being so condescending towards someone who disagrees with you, maybe you should do some reading, too. I personally found this quote about Mary Tocco interesting,
"Is this really the best the anti-vaccination crowd has to offer? Can't they at least find a real legitimate doctor who has some published studies to his or her name? Apparently not, and the amusing thing is these idiots eat this stuff up. They don't even bother to ask her if she has any higher level of education or what degrees or certifications she holds (none). They don't check her credentials nor do they ask her where this knowledge of hers came from - they merely accept it as fact because they are naive and they like to be surrounded by others who are as equally ignorant as themselves as it helps them feel better about their lack of scientific understanding."
http://lowellhubbs.blogspot.com/2010/10/lowell-hubbs-world-mary-toccos.html
More appropriate stories:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/health/26vaccine.html
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/Index.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/13/us-mercury-autism-idUSTRE68C1CZ20100913
I'm not a huge fan of pharma but this one's been debunked SO many times. I guess I'm incredibly lucky that I had my MMR without side effects - actually twice since my mom couldn't find the records of my first vaccination but it was required for school.
Phyllis Coffey
11:23 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012
Thank you Sara.....You said it better than I ever could have. I really didn't want to get into a shouting match with the guy. I just hoped that people might read my comment and do some research so they will make informed decisions.